[X] Close
You are about to erase all the values you have customized, search history, page format, etc.
Click here to RESET all values       Click here to GO BACK without resetting any value
Item 1 of about 1
1. Engmann C, Garces A, Jehan I, Ditekemena J, Phiri M, Thorsten V, Mazariegos M, Chomba E, Pasha O, Tshefu A, Wallace D, McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Carlo WA, Wright LL, Bose C: Birth attendants as perinatal verbal autopsy respondents in low- and middle-income countries: a viable alternative? Bull World Health Organ; 2012 Mar 1;90(3):200-8
MedlinePlus Health Information. consumer health - Stillbirth.

  • [Source] The source of this record is MEDLINE®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  • [Title] Birth attendants as perinatal verbal autopsy respondents in low- and middle-income countries: a viable alternative?
  • OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using birth attendants instead of bereaved mothers as perinatal verbal autopsy respondents.
  • METHODS: Verbal autopsy interviews for early neonatal deaths and stillbirths were conducted separately among mothers (reference standard) and birth attendants in 38 communities in four developing countries.
  • Concordance between maternal and attendant responses was calculated for all questions, for categories of questions and for individual questions.
  • The sensitivity and specificity of individual questions with the birth attendant as respondent were assessed.
  • FINDINGS: For early neonatal deaths, concordance across all questions was 94%.
  • Concordance was at least 95% for more than half the questions on maternal medical history, birth attendance and neonate characteristics.
  • Concordance on any given question was never less than 80%.
  • Sensitivity and specificity varied across individual questions, more than 80% of which had a sensitivity of at least 80% and a specificity of at least 90%.
  • For stillbirths, concordance across all questions was 93%.
  • Concordance was 95% or greater more than half the time for questions on birth attendance, site of delivery and stillborn characteristics.
  • Sensitivity and specificity varied across individual questions.
  • Over 60% of the questions had a sensitivity of at least 80% and over 80% of them had a specificity of at least 90%.
  • Overall, the causes of death established through verbal autopsy were similar, regardless of respondent.
  • CONCLUSION: Birth attendants can substitute for bereaved mothers as verbal autopsy respondents.
  • The questions in existing harmonized verbal autopsy questionnaires need further refinement, as their sensitivity and specificity differ widely.

  • [Email] Email this result item
    Email the results to the following email address:   [X] Close
  • [Cites] Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Dec;14(12):1496-504 [19799757.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):239-45 [16583084.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):164 [16583068.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):478-85 [16084256.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):409-17 [15976891.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Mar;83(3):171-7 [15798840.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900 [15752534.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(5):389-95 [9447773.001]
  • [Cites] World Health Forum. 1996;17(4):373-6 [9060234.001]
  • [Cites] Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S5-18, S19 [19815202.001]
  • [Cites] Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S89-112 [19815200.001]
  • [Cites] N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 18;362(7):614-23 [20164485.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2010 Jun 5;375(9730):1969-87 [20466419.001]
  • [Cites] Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:38-55 [20203105.001]
  • [Cites] Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):608-15 [20605304.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1448-63 [21496911.001]
  • [Cites] J Perinatol. 2011 Dec;31(12):745-8 [22124515.001]
  • [Cites] J Perinatol. 2012 Aug;32(8):585-92 [22076413.001]
  • [Cites] Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(5-6):481-99 [16899150.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):678-82 [19784447.001]
  • [Cites] Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):112-7 [19201402.001]
  • [Cites] J Perinatol. 2009 Mar;29(3):187-94 [19110535.001]
  • [Cites] Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;22(5):410-6 [18782248.001]
  • [Cites] Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1372-80 [18450880.001]
  • [Cites] PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 20;4(11):e327 [18031196.001]
  • [Cites] Lancet. 2007 Nov 3;370(9598):1569-77 [17992727.001]
  • [Cites] Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Aug;85(8):570-1 [17768508.001]
  • [Cites] Soc Sci Med. 1996 Dec;43(11):1561-7 [8961400.001]
  • (PMID = 22461715.001).
  • [ISSN] 1564-0604
  • [Journal-full-title] Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • [ISO-abbreviation] Bull. World Health Organ.
  • [Language] ENG
  • [Grant] United States / NICHD NIH HHS / HD / U01 HD043464; United States / NICHD NIH HHS / HD / U01 HD043475; United States / NICHD NIH HHS / HD / U01 HD043475-03S1; United States / NICHD NIH HHS / HD / U01 HD040607; United States / NICHD NIH HHS / HD / U01 HD040657; United States / NICHD NIH HHS / HD / U01 HD040636
  • [Publication-type] Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • [Publication-country] Switzerland
  • [Other-IDs] NLM/ PMC3314200
  •  go-up   go-down


Advertisement





Advertisement